Splish Splash, It’s A Chemical Bath

Splish Splash, It’s A Chemical Bath
Nothing can be as traumatic as a debilitating chemical accident at work. Safety regulators and courts are tough on employers and sympathetic to workers who suffer eye injuries as a result of an accident at work. But preventing serious accidents is relatively easy and often inexpensive.
– By Isaac Rudik

Too often, too little attention is paid to risks posed by potential workplace eye injuries. Yet nothing can be as traumatic as losing even partial eyesight – and both provincial safety regulators and the courts are tough on employers and very sympathetic to workers who suffer eye injuries as a result of an accident at work.

Even when a company thinks it’s doing the right thing for workers, it may not be doing enough.

For example, not long ago a lab technician who was wearing safety glasses suffered permanent eye injury when a chemical splash got under the goggles. His eyes were not completely protected because goggles provided by the lab were not designed to be worn on top of glasses. Yet no warning signs or labels were posted. A co-worker rushing to the employee’s aid took him to the eyewash station but the natural reflex to shut the eyes prevented the worker from flushing both eyes for 15 minutes.

Numerous Risks

While perhaps the most debilitating, it’s not just eyes that are at risk to injury from chemical splashes. Skin burns and damage to internal organs from inhaling chemical fumes are serious risks that must be addressed seriously. Moreover, hazardous substances are found in countless workplaces. Indeed, they are in most work areas including shops, factories, farms and even offices.

Countless substances such as sulfuric, nitric and hydrofluoric acids are common in many industrial processes, and along with alkali’s including ammonia, magnesium, and potassium, are all hazardous. If not handled with caution, any one of them will cause serious burns and injuries.

In fact, there is a wide range of gas, solid and liquid hazardous materials that workers need to be protected from so exposure cannot cause a life-altering accident.

Identifying and controlling risks faced by workers is not difficult, nor is it necessarily expensive – if a business knows where to look and how to adjust the way the shop floor works. There are steps any company can take immediately:

1. Isolate dangerous processes with barriers or separate the work area.
2. Provide adequate training and supervision.
3. Familiarize workers with hazards, educating them on workplace safety and emergency procedures.
4. Establish safe work practices such as restricting area access, reducing clutter, replacing container lids, providing for safe storage and being prepared for an emergency.
5. Use local exhaust ventilation or automate the workplace process.

Beyond these, it is vitally important to install back splash guards to protect workers from splattering water, flying debris and other mishaps. And a lab safety shield can protect against UV radiation, splattering liquids, flying glass and other hazards while allowing a clear, undistorted view of work area.

While companies often point to lockers full of personal protective equipment such as gloves, lab coats, safety glasses and dust masks, generally these are only supplements to more direct and effective controls.

Prevent, Don’t Prevaricate

The worker who suffered the serious eye injury never returned to work. The company paid a hefty fine for not alerting workers to the proper use and limitations of safety goggles, and a court awarded the man substantial damages because it ruled the employer was careless. But his life will never be the same again.

For example, had the worker been provided with either goggles that fit securely over glasses or a face shield, the injury might have been prevented altogether. Indeed, proper protective clothing should be a “must have” in any workplace where there is exposure to acid or alkaline solutions. These include protective clothing, masks and barriers.

The proper fume hood for a given exposure will help ensure that fume “seepage” doesn’t endanger employees – either those working directly with the hazardous material and those in the rest of the plant.

Like so many workplace accidents, if a company is willing to take positive, often inexpensive, steps to minimise the risks facing employees and the potential exposure facing the business, problems can be avoided easily.




Isaac Rudik is a compliance consultant with Compliance Solutions Canada Inc. , Canada’s largest provider of health, safety and environmental compliance solutions to industrial, institutional and government facilities.

E-mail Isaac at irudik@csc-inc.ca or phone him at 905-761-5354.